Baby
Names - Choosing Trendy or Traditional
Lists
of baby names are always fun to look at, whether you're seeking
a name for your soon-to-be-born baby boy or baby girl, wondering
about the popularity of your own first name, or just curious
about what baby names are currently hot.
What
I find particularly interesting is tracking the popularity of
baby names over the decades. In looking through U.S.
government baby name lists from 1880 to the present, some
amusing patterns emerge, particularly in regards to baby names
for girls.
For
example, in Victorian times Biblical
names, such as Mary, Sarah and Ruth were very popular for
baby girls. There were also many baby names that sounded very
old-fashioned to me, as a kid growing up in the 1960s, including
names like Martha, Alice, Bertha and Minnie.
From
the 1920s
to the 1950s
certain baby names rose in popularity. For example, I went to
school with many Susans, Debbies, Patricias, and Lindas. All
of these baby names have since waned, to be replaced, by the
1980s,
with fancier names such as Jennifer, Jessica and Nicole. When
I was a children's librarian in the 1980s my preschool storyhours
were populated with little girls named Lauren and Jenny, and
little boys named Alex and Matthew.
More
recently there's been a lot of renewed interest in more "old-fashioned"
baby names like Hannah, Abigail and Ethan, plus many Biblical
names such as Sarah, Rachel, Joshua, Jacob, and Samuel. There's
also been a surge in nontraditional baby names including Madison,
Ashley and Brianna for baby girls, and Brandon and Logan for
baby boys.
It's
interesting to consider the whys and wherefores of such developments.
Sometimes, I suspect, the popularity of a specific actor or
fictional character might result in many babies with a particular
name. For example, were some of the Lauras born in the 1970s
and 1980s given a name suggested by older brothers and sisters
who were growing up watching "Little House on the Prairie
?" Were some attributable to the super popular Laura of
"General Hospital" fame ?
Today
Madison is a very highly ranked baby name for girls (ranking
number 3 in 2003) but, when the film "Splash" came
out in 1984, Tom Hanks' character told Daryl Hannah's character
that Madison was not a bona fide first name.
While
baby girls' names seem quite subject to the whims of fashion
and the top ten lists can change radically over time, I've noticed
that, in general, the top baby names for boys remain far more
stable. Names like John, William and James are perennials, perhaps
because baby boys are often named for their fathers, perpetuating
the popularity of certain baby names from generation to generation.
The "Junior" factor aside, baby boys are also less
apt to be given fanciful names.
A
comparison of the changing fortunes of my own first name, Barbara,
with those of my husband's name, Robert, gives a good illustration
of the difference in stability between baby girl names and baby
boy names over time.
My
name grew in popularity in the 1930s, '40s and '50s, peaking
at the number 2 position in baby name popularity, which it tenaciously
held from 1937 to 1944. When I attended grad school, of a class
of approximately forty students, there were no less than three
baby boomers named Barbara. Should I thank the actress Barbara
Stanwyck for this ? Alas, my first name later suffered a slow,
steady decline and placed at a pitiful number 628 position on
the baby names popularity list for the U.S. in 2003.
Robert,
on the other hand, has survived the vicissitudes of baby name
popularity. It held a coveted spot on the top ten most popular
baby names list every year from 1896 to the late 1980s, often
peaking at number 1 between the 1920s and the 1950s. It has
gradually slipped since the 1990s, but still managed to hold
the respectable slot of number 35 in 2003.
When
naming a baby there are, of course, many other points to consider
besides how popular or unique a name is. Here are some helpful
tips that you can use with your other children to get them involved
in choosing a name for the new baby and to make the process
fun: