Last Best Chance
American voters are turning against the Iraq war, worrying about the economy and losing faith in their political leaders.
Now there's more food for thought in the The New Yorker.
Enough, in fact, to give what most New Yorkers would call agita.
The Talk of the Town this week features an article by Hendrik Hertzberg, about a political hot potato in the form of a short film, Last Best Chance.
Watch the trailer (Windows Media Player)
"It has no sex scenes, no car chases, and no wisecracking sidekicks, and it is only forty-five minutes long," Hertzberg writes, "but it lays out a frighteningly plausible narrative of how terrorists might buy or steal the makings of a nuclear bomb, assemble one, smuggle it halfway around the world, and send it on its way to an American city in an S.U.V."
OK, stop trying to scare us. That's ridiculous. Homeland Security is a No. 1 priority of the Bush administration since 9/11, no?
Sadly, no - at least when it comes to preventing nuclear materials from ever getting here.
But thanks to the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program - lead by Senators Sam Nunn and Richard Lugar (who, by the way, are in hot contention for this year's Nobel Peace Prize) - the hunt is on for weapons of mass destruction that have, in fact, solid basis in reality.
The film about them (Last Best Chance on HBO beginning October 17) was recently previewed at the Park Avenue offices of the Council on Foreign Relations, and sadly illustrates the neglect that the government is showering on the problem.
Mired down in Iraq at the moment, it seems the White House continues to ignore the very real threat posed by former Soviet nuclear materials that, inevitably, will be gotten to by Al Qaeda or other terrrorist organizations first. That is, if the U.S. or Europe don't beat them to it.
Tying up these extremely lethal loose cannons has been ongoing since 1991.
Then, "the United States launched a program aimed at giving the Russians financial and technical help in locking down their bombs," says Hertzberg. "Fourteen years later, half of Russia`s material is still unsecured, and at the present rate the job won`t be finished until 2022." [italics ours]. The author concludes, "We don`t have that long."
Surely, the Bush administration must suspect that Al Qaeda currently has in its crosshairs Los Angeles, Melbourne, Australia, or perhaps a replay in New York or London, this time with even more devastating casualties.
The 9/11 Commission has already reported that al Qaeda has been trying to acquire nuclear weapons for ten years and cited reports that bin Laden wants to carry out a "Hiroshima" somewhere.
Can the current administration afford NOT to "prioritize" this one?
Or will the assertion be made - too late - that nobody could have known this was coming?
Related links:
Get a Free DVD
Copy of Last Best Chance
ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel May 18, 2005
Regarding Last Best Chance (Adobe Acrobat PDF file)
